[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela resolved JCR-2941.
-------------------------
Resolution: Won't Fix
the current format is consistent with the xml-serialization we use(d) to have
for node types. in addition you proposal doesn't address the names of the
aggregated privileges, where the contains element again defines a name
attribute.
> Serialization of privileges should use xml namespaces
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-2941
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2941
> Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: security
> Affects Versions: 2.3.0
> Reporter: Tobias Bocanegra
> Assignee: angela
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.3.0
>
>
> the current serialization of privileges does not make use of the namespace
> capabilities of an xml document. for example
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <privileges xmlns:foo="http://www.foo.com/1.0";>
> <privilege name="foo:testRead"/>
> </privileges>
> the namespace needs to be explicitly defines in the document node, although
> not used in any of the elements. i think a better format would be:
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <privileges xmlns:foo="http://www.foo.com/1.0";>
> <foo:testRead />
> </privileges>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
