[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042236#comment-13042236
]
Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-2980:
------------------------------------
Yep, I spent most of yesterday trying to understand the problem here and in the
end had to just revert the change for now.
We only upgraded to Lucene 3.0 in the trunk after 2.2 had already been branched
(see JCR-2415), which is probably related to why the fix doesn't work the same
in the 2.2 branch as it does in trunk. However, I'm still at loss at why this
seemingly innocent change is causing trouble for 2.2.
> Nodes that have properties marked for async extraction should be available
> for querying
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-2980
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2980
> Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: indexing
> Affects Versions: 2.3.0
> Reporter: Alex Parvulescu
> Assignee: Alex Parvulescu
> Fix For: 2.3.0
>
>
> The problems only appears when dealing with nodes that have async extractors.
> In this case we return a lightweight copy of the node (without the property
> that will be processed in the background).
> The copy algorithm ignores certain field types (that have been probably
> introduced during the Lucene 3 upgrade, not sure) such as
> SingletonTokenStream(s).
> So the lightweight copy does not include all the existing properties,
> therefore the node will not appear in queries during the extraction time.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira