This seems to be happening from time to time and seems to be a timing issue. Giving the lock a bit more time to time out fixed it on my machine. Should we change the test case accordingly?

Michael

junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: A released lock must return a negative number of seconds, was: 1
        at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47)
        at junit.framework.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:20)
at org.apache.jackrabbit.test.api.lock.AbstractLockTest.testLockExpiration(AbstractLockTest.java:277)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:592)
        at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:154)
        at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:127)
        at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106)
        at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124)
        at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109)
        at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:118)
        at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.test.AbstractJCRTest.run(AbstractJCRTest.java:456)
        at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208)
        at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203)
        at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208)
        at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203)
        at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208)
at org.apache.jackrabbit.test.ConcurrentTestSuite.access$001(ConcurrentTestSuite.java:29) at org.apache.jackrabbit.test.ConcurrentTestSuite$2.run(ConcurrentTestSuite.java:67) at EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent.PooledExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)


On 12.8.11 12:43, Apache Jenkins Server wrote:
See<https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit-trunk/org.apache.jackrabbit$jackrabbit-core/1611/>


Reply via email to