Hi, On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Michael Dürig <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1.12.11 14:25, Jukka Zitting wrote: >> If I understand the paper correctly, also this approach requires >> synchronization to establish the serialization order of transactions. > > No I don't think so. What it does is, it cancels problematic transactions. > Detecting these requires finding certain read-write conflicts between > transactions.
But if there are two concurrent transactions, the commit of the other one needs to wait until the first one has been processed before it can complete the check against conflicts. Otherwise how can a conflicting commit be made to fail? BR, Jukka Zitting
