Hi, Sounds promising! That way it will be easier for me to help in this area, as having less code and dependencies will reduce the ramp-up time a lot. If we decide to go in this direction, maybe I can then re-use some of what I have implemented for my (old) J3 prototype.
Regards, Thomas On 12/8/11 7:33 PM, "Michael Dürig" <[email protected]> wrote: > >Hi, > >I just committed a prototype implementation of a JCR repository based on >the Microkernel into the sandbox [1]. In contrast to the SPI based >prototype [2], this is direct implementation not relying on an existing >stack. This is very much work in progress still and many (if not most) >things are not implemented. What currently (should) work is standard >read and session write operations. However, there is no support for name >spaces nor for node types. Furthermore not all property types are >supported yet. > >The intent of this implementation is to be able to experiment with >different approaches. It should help us to decide whether we want to go >with a SPI based implementation and refactor this stack to fit our needs >or whether we want to do a rewrite and reuse existing code where possible. > >Michael > >[1] >http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jackrabbit/sandbox/jackrabbit-microkernel/ > >[2] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jackrabbit/sandbox/jackrabbit-mk/ > >On 8.12.11 18:18, [email protected] wrote: >> Author: mduerig >> Date: Thu Dec 8 18:18:42 2011 >> New Revision: 1212018 >> >> URL:http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1212018&view=rev >> Log: >> add Microkernel based prototype of JCR implementation (WIP)
