On 2011-12-09 12:32, Michael Dürig wrote:
On 9.12.11 11:23, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Hi,
if this is supposed to be a generic format for use outside
Jackrabbit. But I'm starting to believe it's not.
*If* we want to support ordered collections, than the JSON mapping
should contain additional information on the sort order of the members.
Like this:
{"a": {}, "b": {}, "c": {}, "{somejcrrelateduri}sortorder": [ "a", "b",
"c" ] }
-1 that's too weird for me. Also, duplicating data is always problematic.
What about
{[{"a": {}}, {"b": {}}, {"c": {}}]}
? ;-)
Cute, but will make JSON Pointers complicated - so we would trade a
usable pointer notation for a more compact object representation.
Best regards, Julian
