On 9.12.11 16:51, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Michael Dürig<[email protected]> wrote:
IIUC it is correct to have the notice in that file.
Actually not, at least as far as recent consensus from
[email protected] goes. See JCR-2322 [1] and the related
LEGAL-62 [2] for more background.
So the MIT license should go into the LICENSE file along with the Apache
license? And the NOTICE file should contain nothing except for the
standard header? Sorry I'm a bit lost here...
Michael
What is missing is the MIT license in the license file.
Yep, we should add the LICENSE file.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2322
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-62
BR,
Jukka Zitting
