Hi, Am 31.01.2012 um 14:31 schrieb Jukka Zitting:
> Hi, > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Michael Dürig <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'd rather go for a modern language instead of taping things together ;-) Michael is certainly thinking of Scala which has its own can of issues ... Syntax not being the least of it ;) > > Indeed, that's another point I've been thinking about.... I am not really sure, whether we should really open this can of worms ... I for my part I would expect JR 3 to still be easily embedded in a JVM (deployed in an OSGi framework running in a JVM, actually), which pretty much excludes anything not being compiled to Java Byte Code executable by the JVM. Regards Felix
