Hi, > option.transactions.supported = true
Is this JTA, right? Is it really required? > shareable nodes > it shouldn't be hard to implement them properly when starting from >scratch. In my (old) prototype they caused a rather big architectural change. I wouldn't support them if possible. >>node.type.management.orderable.child.nodes.supported = false > >why? in CQ we rely on the ability to have orderable child nodes. The problem is we want to support large child node lists, and for this case keeping them ordered is expensive (possible, but more complex, and will slow down adding/removing child nodes to such nodes by factor 2-3). Currently, small child node lists (less than 2000 child nodes or so) are orderable, but large ones are not. >i would appreciate if XPATH was still being supported. What about if we support a (to be defined) subset of XPATH? For example by converting it to SQL2. Regards, Thomas
