On 2012-02-23 10:50, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Hi,
option.transactions.supported = true
Is this JTA, right? Is it really required?
shareable nodes
it shouldn't be hard to implement them properly when starting from
scratch.
In my (old) prototype they caused a rather big architectural change. I
wouldn't support them if possible.
node.type.management.orderable.child.nodes.supported = false
why? in CQ we rely on the ability to have orderable child nodes.
The problem is we want to support large child node lists, and for this
case keeping them ordered is expensive (possible, but more complex, and
will slow down adding/removing child nodes to such nodes by factor 2-3).
Currently, small child node lists (less than 2000 child nodes or so) are
orderable, but large ones are not.
i would appreciate if XPATH was still being supported.
What about if we support a (to be defined) subset of XPATH? For example by
converting it to SQL2.
I believe you can map all of JCR-XPath to SQL2.
