Hi, On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Alexander Klimetschek <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 2/28/12 1:40 PM, "Felix Meschberger" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I might have missed a thing, but where has oak gone ? > > +1 for Oak
OK, given the positive feedback on Oak, I put it back to the poll on http://www.doodle.com/zpnpmcv69pfaw73f. Doodle allows you to edit your response (or add a new one) if you already participated but would also like to +1 Oak. I think Oak should be fine as a development codename (that's why I used it in the Labs), but it might be a bit troublesome to promote to a full stable product name down the line. BR, Jukka Zitting
