Hi, >store order >explicitly as Jukka proposed.
So for small child node lists, you would store the order as a hidden "childNodeOrder" property? That's an option. It would delegate functionality to the upper layer, and make things there a bit more complex. Probably it would hurt the normal case (small, orderable child node lists) a bit. But it would be consistent. Also, it would be more Json-style. I guess both have advantages and disadvantages. Regards, Thomas
