+1 on ignoring now and revisiting later
>
>
> On 30.3.12 15:13, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> Anyway, to avoid getting stuck on this point, here's a somewhat
>> radical suggestion:
>>
>> Let's drop trying to support more than one workspace for now!
>
> +1 Good idea!
>
> Michael
>
>>
>> Practically all our use cases require just a single default workspace,
>> so we'll be able to cover most of our goals without worrying about
>> extra workspaces and the login/user management/jcr:system mapping/etc.
>> complexities they bring to the table.
>>
>> Once we have the basics in place, we can return to the question of
>> workspace support say in the Oak 0.5 - 0.7 timescale (just a rough
>> estimate), at which point it should still be fairly straightforward to
>> implement.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> BR,
>>
>> Jukka Zitting
