[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13293666#comment-13293666
 ] 

Stefan Guggisberg commented on OAK-138:
---------------------------------------

> I'd rather just put the code to oak-mk as it's tightly bound to the 
> MicroKernel interface.

oak-mk contains one specific implementation of the MicroKernel API. 

the remoting code OTOH is generic and can be used with any mk implementation. 
i'd prefer a separate module for the remoting layer instead of putting 
everything mk-related into the current oak-mk module.
                
> Move client/server package in oak-mk to separate project
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-138
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-138
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core, it, mk, run
>    Affects Versions: 0.3
>            Reporter: Dominique Pfister
>            Assignee: Dominique Pfister
>
> As a further cleanup step in OAK-13, I'd like to move the packages 
> o.a.j.mk.client and o.a.j.mk.server and referenced classes in oak-mk to a 
> separate project, e.g. oak-mk-remote.
> This new project will then be added as a dependency to:
> oak-core
> oak-run
> oak-it-mk

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to