On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Julian Reschke <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2012-06-12 16:40, Bart van der Schans wrote: >> >> ... >> >> It's a quite common pattern. Once the node is loaded in the >> BundleCache (or an item/session cache) the hasProperty and getProperty >> calls are not that expensive. A call to the persistence layer to fetch >> the node data is much more expensive. If it is a performance hit in >> your case, do you have some profiler logs or benchmarks? >> ... > > > I'm looking at JCR-2950 and have the impression that the pair of calls > causes duplicate ACL checks. > > And yes, we may want to find out why those happen. > > But in my experience the best way to optimize is to avoid unnecessary calls, > not to make doing them less expensive :-)
Yes of course ;-) We have our own access manager that caches the read permissions quite efficiently so that might be why we have never noticed a performance issue. Regards, Bart
