Hi,

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Ard Schrijvers
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Writing it to local FS instead of memory would then also be an option,
> right?

Definitely. The current approach of loading the index binaries to
memory is just a temporary solution (the easiest thing that could
possibly work :-) that certainly won't scale to larger indexes. We'll
need to extend the binary value mechanism a bit to match features
(mostly random access) that Lucene needs.

BR,

Jukka Zitting

Reply via email to