[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13502736#comment-13502736
]
Thomas Mueller commented on JCR-3460:
-------------------------------------
The NodeTypeIndex also currently uses the TraversingCursor
> PropertyIndex uses TraversingCursor but should not
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-3460
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3460
> Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: query
> Reporter: Thomas Mueller
> Assignee: Thomas Mueller
>
> The org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.property.PropertyIndex uses the
> traversing cursor (that traverses over the whole repository) when there is no
> index. This is not how the index mechanism is supposed to work: if there is
> no property index, then the cost function of the property index should return
> infinity or max value, so that the property index isn't used.
> According to my test the PropertyIndex never really falls back to traversing,
> so this might just be "defensive programming". However, in this case it would
> be better if the code would throw an exception, otherwise we risk not seeing
> the bug in the PropertyIndex cost method.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
