[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13626431#comment-13626431
]
Thomas Mueller commented on JCR-3547:
-------------------------------------
Approach 2 is much better I think. If serializing the tests is not needed, then
I think we shouldn't do it. That way there is less risk to introduce bugs /
change behavior.
Do you want to submit a new patch where the tests are not moved? I can do it
myself if you want (it would just take a bit more time I guess).
> Should I go for RTC?
No, I think voting is not needed, just somebody else reviewing the (final,
smaller) patch.
> Datastore GC doesn't reset updateModifiedDateOnAccess on datastore
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-3547
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3547
> Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: jackrabbit-core
> Affects Versions: 2.4, 2.5
> Reporter: Shashank Gupta
> Attachments: GarbageCollector.java.patch,
> GC_prevent_concurrent_run_app2.patch, GC_prevent_concurrnet_run_app1.patch
>
>
> In mark phase, GC updates store.updateModifiedDateOnAccess with current time,
> so that datastore updates record’s lastModified timestamp upon subsequent
> read/scan.
> But GC doesn't reset it to 0. So even after GC completes, datastore will
> continue updating lastModified timestamp on read invocations and it will have
> performance impact.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
