[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13648801#comment-13648801
]
Cody Burleson edited comment on JCR-3588 at 5/3/13 9:09 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------
See the attached image, Screen Shot 2013-05-03 at 3:49. As to be expected,
throughput decreases as the response time increases when we take load off one
of the nodes, (leaving the load only on the other node). This happens at
position 44-45 (counter numbers along the bottom of each report graph)
was (Author: cody.burleson):
See the attached image, Screen Shot 2013-05-03. As to be expected,
throughput decreases as the response time increases when we take load off one
of the nodes, (leaving the load only on the other node). This happens at
position 44-45 (counter numbers along the bottom of each report graph)
> Response time higher on Node1 with load when Node2 has no load
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-3588
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3588
> Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: clustering
> Affects Versions: 2.4.3
> Environment: CentOS 6.4 running WebSphere Application Server
> 7.0.0.19. Jackrabbit cluster configuration with 2 WAS servers. Repository on
> DB2 9.7.
> Reporter: Cody Burleson
> Attachments: JackrabbitCluster-ResponseTime.png, Node1repository.xml,
> Node2repository.xml, Screen Shot 2013-05-03 at 3.49.52 PM.png
>
>
> In our performance analysis, we are seeing a strange effect, which we does
> not make sense to us. It may or may not be a defect, but we need to
> understand why the effect occurs. In a 2 node cluster, we can run a certain
> load (reading and writing) directly on Node1 and an equivalent load (reading
> and writing on Node2). We measure the response time on both nodes, and it's
> less than 2 seconds. If we stop the load to one of the servers, the response
> time on the other server triples (with no additional load). See attached
> image "JackrabbitCluster-ResponseTime.png". The left side of the report shows
> when only one node (Node1) has load and Node2 has no load. In this case, the
> response times on Node1 are at about 6 seconds. Then, on the right side of
> the report, we add an equivalent load to Node2 and then the response times on
> Node1 drop to 2 seconds. So, the load on Node1 was always consistent, yet
> ADDING load to Node2 actually improves response time on Node1. Logically, it
> doesn't make much sense, eh? Someone, please, at least help us understand why
> this may be happening.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
