hi Tobias, Thanks for the notification, I've filed JCR-3724, we should continue this discussion there if needed.
I see you did not vote at all so I don't think this should affect the current release process. best, alex On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Tobias Bocanegra <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Alex, > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Alex Parvulescu > <[email protected]> wrote: > > A candidate for the Jackrabbit 2.7.4 release is available at: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/2.7.4/ > > > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/tags/2.7.4/ > > > > The SHA1 checksum of the archive is > > 514691edbe20576a58143995249e37ac68d0b80b. > > > > A staged Maven repository is available for review at: > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejackrabbit-1002/ > > > > The command for running automated checks against this release candidate > is: > > > > $ sh check-release.sh 2.7.4 514691edbe20576a58143995249e37ac68d0b80b > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.7.4. > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.7.4 > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > > > > > > My vote is +1 > > I'm a bit concerned about your change in > http://svn.apache.org/r1565601 where you moved the > AbstractLazyIterator to jcr-commons from oak but didn't increase > exported OSGi package version in the > org.apache.jackrabbit.commons.iterator package. In order to define the > proper package imports for oak, I suggest that we increase the package > version from 2.3 to 2.3.1 > > regards, toby >
