hi jukka makes sense to me... if you don't mind i would opt for keeping 3.0 reserved for that unified *rabbit and set the current version to 2.9-SNAPSHOT to avoid confusions and not putting too much pressure on us to complete the merge.
kind regards angela On 27/05/14 15:19, "Jukka Zitting" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Angela Schreiber <[email protected]> >wrote: >> while resolving an issue that didn't make it into 2.8, i realized >> that the version of the trunk is now set to 3.0-SNAPSHOT. >> >> while i don't care too much about the number itself, it looks a bit >> confusing to me, because some time ago we used to call jr3 what is now >> oak. from my understanding we decided to not merge oak and jackrabbit. >> if this was still true, i would find 2.x-SNAPSHOT more intuitive >> than 3.0 which somehow implies that this is going to be another major >> version of jackrabbit, which IMO is not very likely. > >I'm still hoping that we'd bring Oak back into Jackrabbit for a >unified Jackrabbit 3.0 (aka Blackrabbit) release. See >http://markmail.org/message/u7dsue7ezb4cd4ox and >http://markmail.org/message/yydr4ry7m3tmjinf. Thus the 3.0-SNAPSHOT >version. > >But we could also set the version to 2.9-SNAPSHOT for now. Either way >works for me. > >> btw: is there a particular reason for not having a 2.8 branch? i was >> looking for it as i wanted to merge some fixes. > >No reason, so I just created the branch. > >BR, > >Jukka Zitting
