[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRSITE-47?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14201858#comment-14201858
]
Bertrand Delacretaz commented on JCRSITE-47:
--------------------------------------------
Both http and https work for me now:
{code}
$ curl -s https://jackrabbit.apache.org/ | grep Welcome
<TITLE>Welcome to Apache Jackrabbit</TITLE>
<LI><A href="" title="Welcome to Apache
Jackrabbit">Welcome</A></LI>
<H1>Welcome to Apache Jackrabbit</H1>
<H2><A name="WelcometoApacheJackrabbit-ApacheJackrabbitNews"></A>Apache
Jackrabbit News</H2>
$ curl -s http://jackrabbit.apache.org/ | grep Welcome
<TITLE>Welcome to Apache Jackrabbit</TITLE>
<LI><A href="" title="Welcome to Apache
Jackrabbit">Welcome</A></LI>
<H1>Welcome to Apache Jackrabbit</H1>
<H2><A name="WelcometoApacheJackrabbit-ApacheJackrabbitNews"></A>Apache
Jackrabbit News</H2>
{code}
> Site is completely broken
> -------------------------
>
> Key: JCRSITE-47
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRSITE-47
> Project: Jackrabbit Site
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: site
> Reporter: Rick Herrick
> Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: Screen Shot 2014-11-05 at 7.27.14 AM.png
>
>
> The [Jackrabbit site|http://jackrabbit.apache.org] is completely broken and
> unusable. It has been for at least a couple of days. We're trying to decide
> if we should be using Jackrabbit as a back-end storage system. Does this
> indicate we shouldn't be using Jackrabbit as it's not being maintained?
> Should we be looking to Oak instead?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
