[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Unico Hommes updated JCR-3840:
------------------------------
Description:
The following is a legal cnd, accepted both by jackrabbit, and not prohibited
by the JCR spec:
[type]
+ child (type1)
+ child (type2)
This scenario is not taken into account by NodeTypeDefDiff, which leads to node
types wrongly failing to reload or wrongly succeeding to reload, depending on
the situation.
was:
The following is a legal cnd, accepted both by jackrabbit, and not prohibited
by the JCR spec:
[type]
+ child (type1)
+ child (type2)
This scenario is not taken into account by ChildTypeDefDiff, which leads to
node types wrongly failing to reload or wrongly succeeding to reload, depending
on the situation.
> NodeTypeDefDiff does not take same-name child type definitions into account
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-3840
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3840
> Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Unico Hommes
> Assignee: Unico Hommes
>
> The following is a legal cnd, accepted both by jackrabbit, and not prohibited
> by the JCR spec:
> [type]
> + child (type1)
> + child (type2)
> This scenario is not taken into account by NodeTypeDefDiff, which leads to
> node types wrongly failing to reload or wrongly succeeding to reload,
> depending on the situation.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)