[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14574858#comment-14574858
]
Tobias Bocanegra edited comment on JCR-3880 at 6/5/15 5:16 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
for the add/removeMembers(), it could make sense to return the id's of the
members that were actually added/removed, instead of just a boolean?
because what do you do if it returns false? you would need to read the
memberships again to see which one failed.
so:
{code}
String[] addMembers(String... memberIds) throws RepositoryException;
String[] removeMembers(String... memberIds) throws RepositoryException;
{code}
was (Author: tripod):
for the add/removeMembers(), it could make sense to return the id's of the
members that were actually added/removed, instead of just a boolean?
because what do you do if it returns false? you would need to read the
memberships again to see which one failed.
> Allow to add/remove group members by ID
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-3880
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3880
> Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: jackrabbit-api
> Reporter: angela
> Assignee: angela
> Attachments: JCR-3880.patch
>
>
> for some cases it would be convenient if it was possible to add/remove group
> members by ID without having to retrieve the corresponding authorizable
> upfront... in particular for package imports as provided by jackrabbit
> fvault, where the group my be imported before the members are present.
> similar it might be useful to remove dangling membership entries once a
> former member got removed.
> the current implementations already allow for such a behavior when using an
> XML import run with the _besteffort_ flag set for the import of the
> associated protected items (while failing in case of the other
> import-behaviour settings). such it would complete the API coverage for a
> feature we already support while at the same time control it based on the
> repository configuration.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)