On 28/11/2016 10:56, Julian Reschke wrote: > Awesome. Well, if we have to do it, we have to do it. > > In the meantime, it seems, that we need to warn our users, as per: > > "Also please note that in the 2nd situation (where a temporary > exclusion has been granted), you MUST ensure that NOTICE explicitly > notifies the end-user that a JSON licensed artifact exists. They > may not be aware of it up to now, and that MUST be addressed." -- > <http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201611.mbox/%3C0CE2E8C9-D9B7-404D-93EF-A1F8B07189BF%40apache.org%3E> > > > ...and that applies to releases we do before April, as well, right?
We may add a note in the release notes of all the branches, both JR and Oak regardless. Just to be on the safe side. Then we can remove it later on once we are sure no dependencies are no longer there. Davide
