[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konrad Windszus updated JCRVLT-231:
-----------------------------------
Description:
Currently the {{repositoryStructurePackages}} parameter is only used in the
DependencyValidator (to check for collisions and coverage of intermediate
nodes). But the according packages don't end up in the package's dependencies
metadata section, therefore this information cannot be evaluated when the
package is installed somewhere.
I am wondering why the repositoryStructurePackages should be treated
differently than any other regular dependency. In any case the javadoc of that
parameter should be clarified.
was:
Currently the {{repositoryStructurePackages}} parameter is only used in the
DependencyValidator (to check for collisions and coverage of intermediate
nodes). But the according package doesn't end up in the package's dependencies
metadata section, therefore this information cannot be evaluated when the
package is installed somewhere.
I am wondering why the repositoryStructurePackages should be treated
differently than any other regular dependency. In any case the javadoc of that
parameter should be clarified.
> Clarify repositoryStructurePackages parameter
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCRVLT-231
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-231
> Project: Jackrabbit FileVault
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: package maven plugin
> Affects Versions: package-maven-plugin-1.0.0
> Reporter: Konrad Windszus
>
> Currently the {{repositoryStructurePackages}} parameter is only used in the
> DependencyValidator (to check for collisions and coverage of intermediate
> nodes). But the according packages don't end up in the package's dependencies
> metadata section, therefore this information cannot be evaluated when the
> package is installed somewhere.
> I am wondering why the repositoryStructurePackages should be treated
> differently than any other regular dependency. In any case the javadoc of
> that parameter should be clarified.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
