[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Seifert updated JCRVLT-239:
----------------------------------
Attachment: JCRVLT-239-v3.patch
added an updated version of the patch including two integration tests:
[^JCRVLT-239-v3.patch]
acHandling set as plugin config property still has higher precedence than if
set via the properties map - we can change it if you think this is a bad
decision. (i've seen that e.g. for the description property the entry in the
property map has higher precedence than the project description, also this is
not exactly the same scenario).
> Package Maven Plugin: Add "acHandling" property
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCRVLT-239
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-239
> Project: Jackrabbit FileVault
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: package maven plugin
> Affects Versions: package-maven-plugin-1.0.0
> Reporter: Stefan Seifert
> Fix For: package-maven-plugin-1.0.1
>
> Attachments: JCRVLT-239-v2.patch, JCRVLT-239-v3.patch,
> JCRVLT-239.patch
>
>
> currently, it is only possible indirectly via the "properties" property to
> set the "acHandling" package parameter. furthermore it is not mentioned at
> all in the plugin docs, nor its possible values.
> as the "acHandling" package property is used quite often in package
> definitions it would be useful to have a property in the mojo itself, same as
> it is the case for "requiresRoot", "allowIndexDefinitions", "packageType".
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
