On 2018-07-18 09:42, Marcel Reutegger wrote:
I would say that these are not *necessarily* HTTP-specific, and thus
we should try to define them in a generic way.
I agree when we look at file name and content type, these are also
present in JCR when you have a nt:file/nt:resource node structure, but
we probably also want to add a content disposition type to the download
options. How would you define this in a generic way?
...
Adding the disposition type here is a new concept. Why is it needed now
and not before?
AFAIU, some applications on top of the JCR API add the "atttachment"
disposition type in order to prevent browsers to run user-provided
HTML/JS. But those do that in a servlet filter, right? We'd have to find
out how to address this use case with the new API...
Best regards, Julian
