[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16606436#comment-16606436
 ] 

Dominik Süß commented on JCRVLT-319:
------------------------------------

[~tripod] -  minor adjustments & added test for the stacked executionPlan 
scenario. This reflects the usage scenario where plans need to be fully 
calculatable without having to execute the plan. I therefore added an option to 
export the calculated PackageIds and inject those in a secondary plan as 
"satisfied" dependencies that the consumer takes care of. The test also 
validates that if you try to execute the plan it will fail correctly.

> Allow building of stacked ExecutionPlans
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCRVLT-319
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-319
>             Project: Jackrabbit FileVault
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Packaging
>            Reporter: Dominik Süß
>            Assignee: Dominik Süß
>            Priority: Major
>
> The implementation of ExecutionPlanBuilder currently does not provide an 
> option to "pre-satisfy" dependencies when building but always checks for the 
> install state. 
> This comes with the following downsides:
> * it is not possible to prebuild stacking execution plans that would be 
> satisfied/valid when executed in sequence - as soon as the validation is 
> being performed the second plan automatically spawns install tasks for the 
> packages missing
> * The tasks for missing dependencies are automatically created with 
> PackageTask.Type.INSTALL even if all other tasks are EXTRACT tasks.
> This improvement is about adding some kind of DependencyValidationHandler 
> which allows controlling how to handle a "missing" dependency (default 
> behavior right now is to check if already installed and add an install task 
> if missing)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to