As long as it is not embedded that shouldn't be any problem. But it is very hard to ensure backwards compatibility that way, because currently there is no IT testing FileVault with Java 7 and Jackrabbit 2.14. Konrad
> On 5. Sep 2019, at 09:43, Julian Reschke <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 05.09.2019 03:18, Tobias Bocanegra wrote: >> Hi, >> >> ok. So from the jackrabbit / oak side we have: >> >> - Jackrabbit 2.18 - recommended version for Java 8 and newer >> - Jackrabbit 2.16 - Java 8 and newer >> - Jackrabbit 2.14 - recommended version for Java 7 - “end of life” planned >> for Spring 2022 >> >> - Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.16.0 (Java 8 and later) >> - Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.10.x (Java 8 and later) >> - Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.x (Java 8 and later) >> - Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.x (Java 7 and later) >> >> The relevant part for the vault-core osgi bundle is the dependency on the >> jackrabbit APIs. It has no direct bundle dependency to >> Oak. Also, it doesn't embed any other bundles, so as long as the APIs stay >> Java version independent, it should all work. >> ... > > Even if the JAR file for jackrabbit-api is compiled with Java 8? > > Best regards, Julian
