Now that Github Actions are generally available 
(https://github.com/features/actions <https://github.com/features/actions>) I 
would rather invest in this than leveraging the ASF Jenkins due to issues with 
building 3rd party PRs.
For that I would need to be added to the repository collaborators group. 
My github user is added to the ASF Github organization and I actually have 
rights to create workflows e.g. in 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl/actions/new 
<https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl/actions/new> but 
not in https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin 
<https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin>.
Any idea what rights are missing?

Thanks,
Konrad

> On 21. Aug 2019, at 08:47, Marcel Reutegger <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Konrad,
> 
> The jobs have been created manually and they do not use a Jenkinsfile.
> But I agree, it would be good to change that.
> 
> I just added you to the hudson-jobadmin group. You should now be able
> to create jobs on Jenkins.
> 
> Regards
> Marcel
> 
> On 20.08.19, 16:54, "Konrad Windszus" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>    Hi,
>    Instead of configuring it manually I would prefer using Jenkinsfiles for 
> it. Do you have any good example at hand or are all other Jackrabbit Jenkins 
> Jobs manually configured?
>    Usually one uses a Shared Library for setting the jobs up (e.g. compare 
> with https://github.com/apache/sling-tooling-jenkins)
>    Also who is currently Jenkins admin 
> (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Jenkins#Jenkins-HowdoIgetanaccount)?
> 
> 
>    Can you grant me the according rights or set up Jobs for 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/commons/filevault/ and 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/commons/filevault-package-maven-plugin/?
>    Both should be built with Java 7, 8, and 11 both on Windows and Linux.
>    Thanks in advance,
>    Konrad
> 
> 
>    On 20. Aug 2019, at 15:58, Marcel Reutegger <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>    Hi,
> 
>    Travis is nice because it integrates well with GitHub, but there were 
> issues
>    in the past with notification emails sent to the list by travis. It 
> required
>    constant moderation. It looks like this has just very recently been fixed.
>    What a coincidence :)
> 
>    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18843
> 
>    I'd say use the Apache infrastructure if possible, but if travis better 
> fits
>    your requirements, then it's fine as well.
> 
>    Regards
>    Marcel
> 
>    On 20.08.19, 13:48, "Konrad Windszus" <[email protected]> wrote:
>       According to 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/523a8dbfbf6fa4cef6d98c5e25770a9f8e8525de3781516d031c068a@%3Cprivate.infra.apache.org%3E
>  
> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/523a8dbfbf6fa4cef6d98c5e25770a9f8e8525de3781516d031c068a@<private.infra.apache.org>>
>     it
>        seems wise nowadays to primarily rely on Travis to also enable builds 
> on PRs.
>       WDYT?
> 
> 
>       On 20. Aug 2019, at 13:42, Konrad Windszus <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>       Hi,
>       the information at 
>       https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/continuous-integration.html 
> <https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/continuous-integration.html> seems pretty 
> outdated.
>       On the ASF Jenkins I could not find too many CI jobs either (some 
> related to Oak,
>       https://builds.apache.org/view/AllJobs/).
> 
>       I would like to set up Jobs for Jackrabbit Filevault and Jackrabbit 
> Filevault Maven Plugin. The latter requires also a Windows build job (we 
> faced several Windows only issues in the past).
>       Also it would be nice to have a dedicated view in Jenkins for Apache 
> Jackrabbit which contains all Jobs for Oak, Jackrabbit and Filevault.
>       Is there any reference documentation around the set up of CI jobs at 
> Jackrabbit?
>       Also I could not find any Jenkinsfile anywhere so I guess the Jenkins 
> Jobs are currently maintained manually?
>       Or should I instead rather use Travis?
> 
>       Thanks for your input.
>       Konrad
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to