[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17020914#comment-17020914
]
Dominik Süß commented on JCRVLT-401:
------------------------------------
[~tripod] key question here is if we can and should use containers as wrapper
for applicatin and the corresponding seeding content for the mutable part. I
think we currently don't have specific handling of those for install handling.
In cases wher immutable and mutable installation are separated a container
would only be considered fully installed if all the contained fragments are
installed. We also didn't clarify how containers would be treated in dependency
handling. I personally would say that we could have a strict handling where
they would not be considered at all and a compat handling where they would be
rather treated liked mixed packages from an install behavior.
The way we consume this in AEM right now such containers would be extracted but
never installed so we don't have an active requirement to implement the
enforcement in vault right now - yet it might make sense to eventually enforce
it.
> Clarify allowed contents of container package type
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCRVLT-401
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-401
> Project: Jackrabbit FileVault
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: vlt
> Affects Versions: 3.4.2
> Reporter: Konrad Windszus
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.4.4
>
>
> This is a follow up to JCRVLT-170 to clarify if containers are allowed to
> contain packages of type "content", "container" and/or "mixed".
> See also
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-170?focusedCommentId=17012844&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17012844
> and the discussion at
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r36a13cf204fcb570648c18f9c9feb8f72b83fdd276a200718b069fcf%40%3Cdev.jackrabbit.apache.org%3E.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
