[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17031630#comment-17031630
]
Konrad Windszus edited comment on JCRVLT-401 at 2/6/20 2:43 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
[~dsuess][[~tripod] Can we somehow come to an agreement here? The documentation
at
https://docs.adobe.com/content/help/en/experience-manager-cloud-service/implementing/developing/aem-project-content-package-structure.html#xml-container-package-filters
already assumes that all packages are allowed to be placed within containers.
Also https://github.com/adobe/aem-core-wcm-components/blob/master/all/pom.xml
contains different sub package types (although not explicitly stating a
packaging type yet).
was (Author: kwin):
[~dsuess][[~tripod] Can we somehow come to an agreement here? The documentation
at
https://docs.adobe.com/content/help/en/experience-manager-cloud-service/implementing/developing/aem-project-content-package-structure.html#xml-container-package-filters
already assumes that all packages are allowed to be placed within containers.
> Clarify allowed contents of container package type
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCRVLT-401
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-401
> Project: Jackrabbit FileVault
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: vlt
> Affects Versions: 3.4.2
> Reporter: Konrad Windszus
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.4.4
>
>
> This is a follow up to JCRVLT-170 to clarify if containers are allowed to
> contain packages of type "content", "container" and/or "mixed".
> See also
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-170?focusedCommentId=17012844&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17012844
> and the discussion at
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r36a13cf204fcb570648c18f9c9feb8f72b83fdd276a200718b069fcf%40%3Cdev.jackrabbit.apache.org%3E.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
