[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17033803#comment-17033803
]
Konrad Windszus edited comment on JCRVLT-407 at 2/10/20 5:48 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Just take the following file
{code}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<jcr2:root xmlns:jcr2="http://www.jcp.org/jcr/1.0"; xmlns:rep="internal"
jcr2:primaryType="nt:unstructured">
<jcr2:content jcr2:primaryType="nt:unstructured" />
<jcr2:system/>
</jcr2:root>
{code}
IMHO the namespace prefix in the repository should be independent of the prefix
used in the XML (which is already supported for property names, but not yet for
node names).
was (Author: kwin):
Just take the following file
{code}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<jcr2:root xmlns:jcr2="http://www.jcp.org/jcr/1.0"; xmlns:rep="internal"
jcr2:primaryType="nt:unstructured">
<jcr2:content jcr2:primaryType="nt:unstructured" >
<jcr2:system/>
</jcr2:root>
{code}
IMHO the namespace prefix in the repository should be independent of the prefix
used in the XML (which is already supported for property names, but not yet for
node names).
> DocView XML: Proper namespace support for node names during import
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCRVLT-407
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-407
> Project: Jackrabbit FileVault
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: vlt
> Affects Versions: 3.4.2
> Reporter: Konrad Windszus
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.4.4
>
>
> Currently any DocView files is processed by the DocViewSAXImporter which
> creates in the end nodes in the repository via
> https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/blob/e05e3fc8031eb08f6d0815316ec7fff3367df53c/vault-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/vault/fs/impl/io/DocViewSAXImporter.java#L800.
> That just takes {{DocViewNode}} as parameter. Unfortunately the node name is
> only contained there in its qualifed (i.e. prefixed) form
> (https://docs.adobe.com/docs/en/spec/jcr/2.0/3_Repository_Model.html#3.2.5.2%20Qualified%20Form).
> In case the XML uses other prefixes than the underlying JCR the namespaces
> won't be correctly resolved, as the node creation happens in
> https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/blob/e05e3fc8031eb08f6d0815316ec7fff3367df53c/vault-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/vault/fs/impl/io/DocViewSAXImporter.java#L1050
> with just the qualified form.
> I would propose that the DocView node uses the expanded form
> (https://docs.adobe.com/docs/en/spec/jcr/2.0/3_Repository_Model.html#3.2.5.1%20Expanded%20Form)
> for node names, similar to property names!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
