[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17033825#comment-17033825
]
Konrad Windszus commented on JCRVLT-407:
----------------------------------------
Well, this is what this bug is about :-) There is one catch though and this is
the one being outlined in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-407?focusedCommentId=17033702&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17033702.
If the node name being given by the jcr:root node is using a namespace as
well, it is unclear who is defining the prefix to URL mapping as the node name
is only given via the filename (and not via an XML element). Which prefixes are
supported for filenames? Are expanded forms supported for file names supported
as well? In
https://jackrabbit.apache.org/filevault/vaultfs.html#Filename_escaping there is
only documentation for qualified forms! How is it supposed to behave? Where is
the prefix/URL mapping supposed to come from in this case?
> DocView XML: Proper namespace support for node names during import
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCRVLT-407
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-407
> Project: Jackrabbit FileVault
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: vlt
> Affects Versions: 3.4.2
> Reporter: Konrad Windszus
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.4.4
>
>
> Currently any DocView files is processed by the DocViewSAXImporter which
> creates in the end nodes in the repository via
> https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/blob/e05e3fc8031eb08f6d0815316ec7fff3367df53c/vault-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/vault/fs/impl/io/DocViewSAXImporter.java#L800.
> That just takes {{DocViewNode}} as parameter. Unfortunately the node name is
> only contained there in its qualifed (i.e. prefixed) form
> (https://docs.adobe.com/docs/en/spec/jcr/2.0/3_Repository_Model.html#3.2.5.2%20Qualified%20Form).
> In case the XML uses other prefixes than the underlying JCR the namespaces
> won't be correctly resolved, as the node creation happens in
> https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/blob/e05e3fc8031eb08f6d0815316ec7fff3367df53c/vault-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/vault/fs/impl/io/DocViewSAXImporter.java#L1050
> with just the qualified form.
> I would propose that the DocView node uses the expanded form
> (https://docs.adobe.com/docs/en/spec/jcr/2.0/3_Repository_Model.html#3.2.5.1%20Expanded%20Form)
> for node names, similar to property names!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
