I little bit more formal:
Vote is open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1, migrate FileVault to Git
[ ] 0
[ ] -1, because...

Thanks,
Konrad

> On 21. May 2020, at 10:45, Konrad Windszus <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> For the actual migration we need a more formal vote than just 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8ea0d827d9e8488183648f2364ecd4e178b6d82e03193735aae6b5cd%40%3Coak-dev.jackrabbit.apache.org%3E.
> 
> So please vote on the migration of FileVault to Git as outlined in the 
> original post. Thanks in advance.
> Konrad
> 
> On 2020/03/16 21:02:13, Konrad Windszus <[email protected]> wrote: 
>> Hi,
>> I would like to tackle the git migration of FileVault [1] soon.
>> 
>> I would propose to create two new repositories named
>> 
>> - jackrabbit-filevault and
>> - jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin
>> 
>> Since this is already the names of the github svn mirror repos [2][3] 
>> currently in place, those would need to be reset during the migration. That 
>> would mean that the open PRs would be lost during the transition.... 
>> (currently 5 open PRs)
>> The question is if there is the need to keep the old svn mirror somewhere 
>> else, or if it is fine, if just the SVN (read-only) repo is used as 
>> reference archive.
>> 
>> I would open an INFRA ticket soon, asking how to deal with the old svn 
>> github mirror and what options we would have for keeping the old svn github 
>> mirror (at a different location)
>> 
>> Konrad
>> 
>> [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-398
>> [2]: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault
>> [3]: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to