[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konrad Windszus updated JCRVLT-598:
-----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 3.6.2
> need IdConflictPolicy compatible with 3.5.0 behavior
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCRVLT-598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-598
> Project: Jackrabbit FileVault
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: vlt
> Affects Versions: 3.5.8
> Reporter: Julian Reschke
> Assignee: Konrad Windszus
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.6.2
>
> Attachments: test-duplicate-referencable-on-child-element-only.zip,
> test-referenceable.zip
>
>
> Currently, according to the documentation
> ([https://jackrabbit.apache.org/filevault/referenceablenodes.html]),
> "IdConflictPolicy.FORCE_REMOVE_CONFLICTING_ID" is supposed to behave as 3.5.0
> did.
> My tests show however that in 3.5.0, when importing a package with two nodes
> with conflicting UUIDs, both nodes were imported (and one of the UUIDs
> changed).
> Update: It turned out that this is only the conflict handling for non-sibling
> nodes, for sibling nodes the behaviour depends on whether the existing
> conflicting node is contained in the filter or not. If it is contained the
> to-be imported node just replaced the conflicting node, if it is not
> contained, the to-be imported node is just skipped!
> From that point of view, CREATE_NEW_ID seems to be closer (but that one
> assigns new UUIDs to *both* nodes).
> -Proposal: adjust CREATE_NEW_ID behavior to keep assigning a new UUID only
> when needed (thus preserving it for one of the nodes), and document *that*
> mode as compatible to 3.5.0.-
> Updated Proposal: Create new IdConflictPolicy.LEGACY which removes
> conflicting nodes in case they are siblings (i.e. share the same parent
> node), otherwise will create a new ID for the to be imported referencable node
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)
