adamcin commented on PR #1013:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/1013#issuecomment-1631038154

   > @adamcin , please don't add unrelated changes to this PR like changing 
variable names. it makes it hard to identify the effective changes you are 
making.
   > 
   > as far as the effective changes are concerned: i would need to take a 
closer look at the TypeEditor and it's usages. in general 'childNodeChanged' 
receives the nodestate of the modified node as 'childNodeAdded' receives the 
newly added child node. i don't recall exactly what the nature of the 'builder' 
is.... and if retrieving the child is equivalent to the state that is passed.
   > 
   > anyway: as far as i can see the relevant change is actually only on line 
299, where the primary type gets set on the child-builder (which is then 
already available for the 'validate the child node'). so the PR should only 
change that and avoid any unrelated changes. i can then take a look again in 
the ide to get a better sense of then change.
   
   Thanks, @anchela . I'll restore the original variable names.
   
   The `after` NodeState appears to represent the child node state in both the 
childNodeChanged and childNodeAdded methods, at least according to the `Editor` 
interface [1], as well the `TypeEditor` implementation of `childNodeAdded` [2], 
which delegates to `childNodeChanged` by passing the `after` parameter without 
modifying it.
   
   [1] 
https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/03b703e91f9964a2f192ccd34526d5980561839a/oak-store-spi/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/spi/commit/Editor.java#L93-L120
   [2] 
https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/03b703e91f9964a2f192ccd34526d5980561839a/oak-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/nodetype/TypeEditor.java#L281-L286


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to