[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17813375#comment-17813375
]
Julian Reschke commented on JCRVLT-743:
---------------------------------------
Question: if we have {{n}} child nodes, we currently need ~ {{2n}} move
operations.
Wouldn't it be better to move the complete node to a temp location? That would
be one move instead of {{n}}, and we would only need {{1 + n}} operations in
total.
> node stashing doesn't always need nt:unstructured
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCRVLT-743
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-743
> Project: Jackrabbit FileVault
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Julian Reschke
> Priority: Major
>
> Using nt:unstructured for the stash node is overkill if the node being
> updated does not required child node ordering.
> We could either use oak:unstructured (when available), or maybe use the type
> of the node to be updated.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
