[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18050370#comment-18050370
]
Konrad Windszus commented on JCRVLT-833:
----------------------------------------
[~tripod] Protected properties can still be written via JCR Sysview Import,
this is leveraged e.g. in
https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/blob/c1d3aba606270a016920388e21b6e696e26700fb/vault-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/vault/fs/impl/io/DocViewImporter.java#L1176-L1191.
However this is done inconsistenly (i.e. only for new nodes not for nodes to
be updated).
> Consolidate which protected properties to consider during export and import
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCRVLT-833
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-833
> Project: Jackrabbit FileVault
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Konrad Windszus
> Priority: Major
>
> Currently the export ignores certain protected properties:
> https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/blob/c1d3aba606270a016920388e21b6e696e26700fb/vault-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/vault/fs/impl/io/DocViewSAXFormatter.java#L121.
> During the import only certain protected properties are considered at all
> (https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/blob/c1d3aba606270a016920388e21b6e696e26700fb/vault-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/vault/fs/impl/io/DocViewImporter.java#L142).
> Currently the set of those two properties are overlapping which is not
> useful (i.e. some protected properties are never contained in the export but
> would be considered during import or are contained in the export but are
> never considered during import).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
