[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18051914#comment-18051914
 ] 

Julian Reschke edited comment on JCRVLT-831 at 1/15/26 2:53 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------

After some heroic brainstorming with [~jhoh], we actually understand what was 
wrong (in ordered collections, sibling nodes namespace prefixes indeed are 
needed).

I'll come up with a test case next (EDIT: -> JCRVLT-834), and then proceed with 
the optimization.


was (Author: reschke):
After some heroic brainstorming with [~jhoh], we actually understand what was 
wrong (in ordered collections, sibling nodes namespace prefixes indeed are 
needed).

I'll come up with a test case next, and then proceed with the optimization.

> For collection of namespace prefixes, avoid iterating over sibling nodes not 
> contained in the filter(s)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCRVLT-831
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-831
>             Project: Jackrabbit FileVault
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: vlt
>            Reporter: Julian Reschke
>            Assignee: Julian Reschke
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 4.2.0
>
>
> It appears that the changes for JCRVLT-789 improved the performance for 
> exporting the *content*, however the phase of collecting namespace prefixes 
> does not use that optimzation.
> (TBD: write a test)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to