On 18/05/2010, Brett Randall <[email protected]> wrote: > +1. > > My only hesitation is that work was done to try and get the Maven+Gump > build passing, but we still have that issue with the odd dependency > bsf-all:jar. I thought we were pretty close to fixing that - should I > look into it again?
By all means - I could not work out why Gump does not find the dependency. It works fine on Hudson and on my WinXP box. I think any changes will be in the Gump descriptors which won't affect the release. But even if changes are needed to the BSF build files in order to support Gump, I don't think that's a release blocker, as the code builds and tests fine without Gump. > If the Maven build is clean it should make > deploying the artifacts to Maven Central easier. I think I have fixed the Maven Deploy. I am just tidying up some loose ends, and will call for a vote shortly. > > Brett > > > On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 2:42 AM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > > There have been a few changes to the BSF 3.x code line since 3.0. > > > > I think it would be good to release version 3.1 along with its Maven > version. > > > > I've asked for Nexus access for BSF 3.x, so I propose to use that for > > staging/voting on the Maven artifacts. > > > > I'm happy to manage the release, unless anyone else wants to do it. > > > > Comments? > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
