On 3 April 2011 08:32, Ben Cuthbert <[email protected]> wrote: > I see the nanotime. But the time in the sampler results is reported in ms. So > when you have you data > it just says 0. I would like it to go one further and report a low level.
Sorry, that's not possible currently. Changing the elapsed time to nanoSecs would break compatibility, and such a level of precision is illusory anyway for almost all of the samplers. It might be possible to keep a separate field for nanoSeconds and report that, but I'm not sure there's sufficient need to warrant the change and additional data storage. > Regards > On 2 Apr 2011, at 16:18, sebb wrote: > >> On 31 March 2011 19:41, Ben Cuthbert <[email protected]> wrote: >>> All >>> >>> I have been looking over the code in the JUnitSampler code under the jmeter >>> source. >>> I would like to make a change to use nanoTime() rather than milliseconds. >> >> Why? >> >>> I can see in the AnnotatedTestCase there is an elapsed time. But I can't >>> see how it >>> is returned to a results table. Any ideas? >> >> The time in AnnotatedTestCase is only used for reporting timeout errors. >> >> The actual sample time is calculated using SampleResult.sampleStart() >> and sampleEnd() which already use nanoTime(). >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
