On 03.10.2011 11:03, sebb wrote: > The 72 hours are up. > > Although some additional bugs have surfaced, as far as I know these > aren't regressions, so users are no worse off running 2.5.1, and in > many respects it is better than 2.5. > > Therefore I think we should continue with the release. > > However, the known bugs section does not mention Bug 51918 and Bug > 51919 so we should probably mention those in the announcement. > Something like: > > "Version 2.5 introduced a concurrent download feature for embedded > HTML resources. Unfortunately this may result in corrupted downloads > or other errors (bugs 51918 and 51919). We will fix these bugs as soon > as possible; meanwhile the feature should not be used". > > OK?
Sounds good. Rainer --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@jakarta.apache.org