On 18 October 2011 22:21, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 18 October 2011 19:50, Philippe Mouawad
> <p.moua...@ubik-ingenierie.com> wrote:
>> Hello Sebb, Milamber , All,
>> I investigated this issue, particularly this part of issue
>>> stramge error for "JMS Subscriber - 001" - Response message:
>>> javax.naming.NamingException: Something already bound at 
>>> Elite_To_MorphoTrak;
>> I created a simple test case and tried not to cache Context and it works
>> fine.
>> and in fact it is due to the fact that we cache Context and use it by many
>> threads.
>> From this:
>> http://download.oracle.com/javase/jndi/tutorial/beyond/misc/sync.html
>> I conclude we should not do caching as it is not mandatory that context is
>> Thread Safe (and it's not the case for AMQ one).
>> Do you remember why Context were cached ? was it because of bad performances
>> if not cached ?
> I think that was before my time.
>> There are 2 solutions for that:
>>   - We remove caching
>>   - We add an  option in GUI to let user select if Context will be cached
>>   or not
> Or we cache per thread, e.g. using ThreadLocal.

I've just realised there is a reason why the Context was being cached.

The Context holds execution context, so needs to be maintained between
samplers in the same thread.

One easy way to fix the context sharing across threads would be to
include the thread name in the context key.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@jakarta.apache.org

Reply via email to