Mauro wrote on 16/03/2007 08:21:36: > I agree - a World with just hash maps is too "harsh" :-) > > But I'm not clear on how you propose to go about it. Would you > > 1 remove current get/put methods from interface - and move them to > implementation, so it'd have to > be cast to HashMapWorld to be used? What would the World become, just > contain the method clear()? > 2 extend interface with bespoke method? > > Cheers
I don't want to remove the methods from the interface, just because 1.0 was meant to be stable. It's not so harsh to implement a couple of get / put methods, and it does give a good indication of the intent. So, 2. Cheers, Liz. -- Elizabeth Keogh [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.livejournal.com/users/sirenian
