Hi Paul,

Im looking for those changes right now...

I are right, do not have to extends Steps and to allow addSteps out of constructor will help a lot...

nice job !!



Paul Hammant escreveu:
It is not going to make it to 2.4, no.  Though some of teh refactorings we're 
doing in 2.4 will facilitate.  One that Mauro's completing now is making steps 
implementation classes POJOs.  I.e. they don't have to extend Steps anymore.

The Guice one should be pretty similar.

Regards,

- Paul

On Jan 7, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Cristiano Gavião wrote:

Hi,


Humm, ok.  I already tried some experimental work myself with guice and 
jbehave,  mostly unsucessfull until now...

But I could get guice to work together with junit, but it was needed to create 
an expecific extension of BlockJUnit4ClassRunner..

Btw, I really think that is should be postponed to 2.5. There is already a lot 
of new features to deal with on 2.4  :-)

regards

Mauro Talevi escreveu:
Cristiano,

the DI support is still very much experimental work we're doing with Paul.   We're still 
trying to work out some fundamentals and if it's stable enough to release in 2.4, or need 
to postpone it to 2.5 (hence we've not gone "public" with it).  As soon as 
we've got a stable build with examples we'll post the details and update the 
documentation.

The issue related to this is JBEHAVE-133.  We are currently working on Pico 
support, with other containers to follow suit.

Cheers

Cristiano Gavião wrote:
Hi people...

I got glad to see that was commited some work for a new extension with a DI 
container... very nice...

I've got interested in  knowing  little more about this feature...

What are the plans and desired behaviors for DI extension for jBehave. What are 
the goals for this feature?

Which classes would be enabled for being injected on jbehave context? Steps on 
Scenarios? Configuration Classes in both steps and scenarios? Third lib classes?

And about configuring DI: using xml, properties or annotation?

is there a issue for this on jira?

thanks

Cristiano

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

  http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

  http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

  http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to