Ah I see, txs 4 the pointer.

LieGrue,
strub



----- Original Message -----
> From: Mauro Talevi <mauro.tal...@aquilonia.org>
> To: dev@jbehave.codehaus.org
> Cc: 
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2013 12:27 AM
> Subject: Re: [jbehave-dev] JBEHAVE-454 ClassPath question
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> this is a known issue.   Some dependencies need to be added to the 
> plugin configuration.
> 
> http://jbehave.org/reference/stable/maven-goals.html
> 
> Cheers
> 
> On 31/03/2013 20:12, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>  btw, there seems to be still an issue with the classpaths.
>> 
>>  The freemarker generator doesn't find log4j (which is in the test 
> classpath). It only works if I add log4j manually.
>>  Otherwise I get the following exception:
>> 
>>  Caused by: org.jbehave.core.embedder.Embedder$RunningEmbeddablesFailed: 
> Failure in running embeddable: at.mycustomer.jbehave.SVNRValidationStory
>>       at 
> org.jbehave.core.embedder.Embedder.runAsEmbeddables(Embedder.java:132)
>>       at 
> org.jbehave.mojo.RunTestStoriesAsEmbeddables.execute(RunTestStoriesAsEmbeddables.java:19)
>>       ... 21 more
>>  Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/log4j/Priority
>>       at 
> freemarker.log.Log4JLoggerFactory.getLogger(Log4JLoggerFactory.java:65)
>>       at freemarker.log.Logger.getLogger(Logger.java:284)
>>       at 
> freemarker.template.utility.SecurityUtilities.<clinit>(SecurityUtilities.java:67)
>>       at 
> freemarker.ext.beans.BeansWrapper.<clinit>(BeansWrapper.java:147)
>>       at 
> freemarker.template.ObjectWrapper.<clinit>(ObjectWrapper.java:69)
>>       at freemarker.core.Configurable.<init>(Configurable.java:139)
>>       at 
> freemarker.template.Configuration.<init>(Configuration.java:142)
>>       at 
> freemarker.template.Configuration.<clinit>(Configuration.java:127)
>>       at 
> org.jbehave.core.reporters.FreemarkerProcessor.configuration(FreemarkerProcessor.java:30)
>>       at 
> org.jbehave.core.reporters.FreemarkerProcessor.process(FreemarkerProcessor.java:21)
>>       at 
> org.jbehave.core.reporters.TemplateableViewGenerator.write(TemplateableViewGenerator.java:237)
>>       at 
> org.jbehave.core.reporters.TemplateableViewGenerator.createReports(TemplateableViewGenerator.java:189)
>>       at 
> org.jbehave.core.reporters.TemplateableViewGenerator.generateReportsView(TemplateableViewGenerator.java:111)
>>       at 
> org.jbehave.core.embedder.Embedder.generateReportsView(Embedder.java:246)
>>       at 
> org.jbehave.core.embedder.Embedder.generateReportsView(Embedder.java:234)
>>       at 
> org.jbehave.core.embedder.Embedder.runStoriesAsPaths(Embedder.java:213)
>>       at org.jbehave.core.junit.JUnitStory.run(JUnitStory.java:24)
>>       at 
> at.mycustomer.jbehave.StoryContainerBase.run(StoryContainerBase.java:80)
>>       at 
> org.jbehave.core.embedder.Embedder.runAsEmbeddables(Embedder.java:123)
>>       ... 22 more
>>  Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.log4j.Priority
>>       at 
> org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.strategy.SelfFirstStrategy.loadClass(SelfFirstStrategy.java:50)
>>       at 
> org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.realm.ClassRealm.loadClass(ClassRealm.java:244)
>>       at 
> org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.realm.ClassRealm.loadClass(ClassRealm.java:230)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  If this plugin needs log4j for logging, then you should add it to the 
> plugin dependencies imo.
>> 
>> 
>>  LieGrue,
>>  strub
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>>  From: Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
>>>  To: "dev@jbehave.codehaus.org" 
> <dev@jbehave.codehaus.org>
>>>  Cc:
>>>  Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 2:39 PM
>>>  Subject: Re: [jbehave-dev] JBEHAVE-454 ClassPath question
>>> 
>>>  counter indication is that you might get test mocks, test resource 
> definitions,
>>>  etc creeping in.
>>> 
>>>  Explicitely making it an own mojo is a safe bet.
>>>  For my project both ways would work, but for others it might not be 
> sufficient
>>>  to always get all the test classpath.
>>> 
>>>  LieGrue,
>>>  strub
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>>>    From: Mauro Talevi <mauro.tal...@aquilonia.org>
>>>>    To: dev@jbehave.codehaus.org
>>>>    Cc:
>>>>    Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 9:25 AM
>>>>    Subject: Re: [jbehave-dev] JBEHAVE-454 ClassPath question
>>>> 
>>>>    Actually, I would argue that having behaviour verification in a 
> separate
>>>>    module in compile scope should be considered a better practice.
>>>> 
>>>>    Integration tests usually have cross-cutting concerns that span 
> multiple
>>>>    Maven modules, whereas the tests in a module's src/test 
> directory are
>>>>    meant to test the functionality of that module.
>>>> 
>>>>    But, regardless, having the resolution scope set to test will 
> cater for
>>>>    both use cases.
>>>> 
>>>>    If the user decides to use the plugin in scope compile, this is 
> included
>>>>    in the test one, and the only minor drawback possibly is that 
> you'll
>>>  get
>>>>    a few extra test-scope dependencies pulled in the resolution, but 
> given
>>>>    that JBehave is a testing tool and the Maven modules are usually 
> the
>>>>    leaves of a build reactor I don't see counter-indications.
>>>> 
>>>>    Cheers
>>>> 
>>>>    On 28/03/2013 19:39, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>     Not sure if this is a good idea. There might be pure behave 
> projects
>>>  which
>>>>    have their behave tests defined as compile scope in 
> src/main/java. I guess
>>>>    it's not the standard case but might theoretically have 
> happened. But
>>>  you
>>>>    know this part much better than I do. All I could do is to point 
> you to the
>>>>    implication of @requiresDependencyResolution, to define the 
> expected usage
>>>  is
>>>>    your task ;)
>>>>>     txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>     strub
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>>     ________________________________
>>>>>>     From: Mauro Talevi <mauro.tal...@aquilonia.org>
>>>>>>     To: dev@jbehave.codehaus.org
>>>>>>     Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 12:46 AM
>>>>>>     Subject: Re: [jbehave-dev] JBEHAVE-454 ClassPath 
> question
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>     We could make all mojos use  
> @requiresDependencyResolution test
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>     I don't see any counterindication atm.  Let me think 
> about it
>>>  ...
>>>>>>     Cheers
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>     On 26/03/2013 10:21, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>     hmm, maybe it got filtered out by the spam filter? I 
> attached the
>>>>    git-format-patch output. LieGrue,
>>>>>     strub ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>     From: Mauro Talevi 
> <mauro.tal...@aquilonia.org> To:
>>>>   dev@jbehave.codehaus.org Cc:
>>>>>     Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 11:07 PM
>>>>>     Subject: Re: [jbehave-dev] JBEHAVE-454 ClassPath question 
> Where have
>>>  you
>>>>    sent the patch? On 25/03/2013 21:15, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>        Hi Mauro!   Just sent a patch for git-am. The 
> main
>>>  issue is
>>>>    that you need a
>>>>>        @requiresDependencyResolution test   in the Mojo if if 
> should also
>>>>    pickup test classpath entries. Otherwise you
>>>>>>>>     will only get the runtime classpath.
>>>>>>>>        txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>        strub   ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>>>        From: Mauro Talevi
>>>  <mauro.tal...@aquilonia.org>
>>>>    To: dev@jbehave.codehaus.org   Cc:
>>>>>        Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 12:36 AM
>>>>>        Subject: Re: [jbehave-dev] JBEHAVE-454 ClassPath 
> question   HI,
>>>  can
>>>>    you send us a simple mvn project reproducing the issue?   The 
> issue
>>>>>        JBEHAVE-454 should be closed AFAICS.    You're issue 
> could be
>>>>>>>>     related to
>>>>>>>>        something else.   Cheers   On 24/03/2013 
> 20:01, Mark
>>>>    Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>         Hi folks!    I have a question 
> regarding
>>>>>>>>     http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JBEHAVE-454
>>>>>>>>         This issue is still marked as 'open' 
> and I
>>>>    currently
>>>>>>>>     facing the
>>>>>>>>        same problem.
>>>>>>>>>>         I _do_ have <scope> set to 
> test, but
>>>  still
>>>>    the jbehave
>>>>>>>>     story gets
>>>>>>>>        executed with the EmbedderClassLoader which 
> does _not_
>>>>    contain any test
>>>>>        classpath.
>>>>>>>>>>         My problem starts when I start a 
> dependency
>>>>    injection container
>>>>>>>>>>        (OpenWebBeans, Spring, Weld or 
> embedded TomEE)
>>>>    because they try to scan
>>>>>>>>     the
>>>>>>>>        ClassPath and subsequently fail to @Inject my 
> beans.
>>>>>>>>>>         There is also a 2nd thingy, which is 
> more a
>>>>    question kind of: for
>>>>>>>>     CDI I
>>>>>>>>        need to assign/open some Contexts to a new 
> Thread. Is
>>>  there
>>>>    some hook
>>>>>>>>     where I
>>>>>>>>        can perform these tasks? I've seen the 
> stories get
>>>>    executed
>>>>>>>>     asynchronously
>>>>>>>>        via Futures.
>>>>>>>>>>         Is there interest in cleaning this 
> up, or is
>>>  even
>>>>    someone working
>>>>>>>>     on it
>>>>>>>>        atm?
>>>>>>>>>>         I could help a bit on the maven part 
> if this
>>>  helps
>>>>    - though I
>>>>>>>>     might need
>>>>>>>>        some help on the jbehave side...
>>>>>>>>>>         txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>         strub
>>>>   
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>         To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>>   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>   
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>        To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>>   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>   
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>        To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>>   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>>   
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>     To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>>   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>   
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>     To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>>   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>>>> 
>>>>>     
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>     To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>>> 
>>>>>         http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>   
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>    To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>> 
>>>>       http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>> 
>>>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>  To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>> 
>>>       http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>> 
>>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>> 
>>       http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> 
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to