Yep no worries.    Are you generally happy with the approach we've taken or
did you have some other architecture in mind?


Tony


On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Mauro Talevi <mauro.tal...@aquilonia.org>wrote:

>  No, work has not started yet.
>
> Contributions always welcome.
> http://jbehave.org/reference/stable/how-to-contribute.html
>
> Be sure to start from the 4.x branch.
>
> Cheers
>
> On 16/07/2013 08:56, Anthony Swan wrote:
>
>  Funny I went through jira over and over and over but didn't see that.
> I see it's still unassigned.  Is the code already done?  If not, we're
> happy to contribute and keep it going.
>
>
>  Tony
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Mauro Talevi 
> <mauro.tal...@aquilonia.org>wrote:
>
>> Hi Tony,
>>
>> it's already on the cards for 4.0:
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JBEHAVE-873
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> On 16/07/2013 08:37, Anthony Swan wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> We have an application that has lots of configuration toggles that get
>>> set in one or more databases or other systems.  In order to facilitate
>>> running in parallel as many tests as possible, we've created a separate
>>> execution path to change the running of stories into running of groups of
>>> stories as some stories are mutually exclusive of others.   All the stories
>>> within a single group are run in parallel and each group waits to finish
>>> before moving to the next.   We played around with multiple invocations of
>>> Jbehave and running filters but that made the report management unwieldy
>>> and made it harder for the people writing the tests to figure out what was
>>> going on.
>>>
>>> Is there any interest from the maintainers in bringing this into the
>>> code base?  If so, I will refactor our code to be more generic and do a
>>> little refactoring of the core code then submit a patch.
>>>
>>> What I've done is extend the Embedder (so that I could extend the
>>> StoryManager and StoryReporter) and extended the StoryReporter.
>>>
>>>
>>> If everyone agrees this is good, I will probably change it to work with
>>> the StoryMapping and get the Mapper to output multiple groups which the
>>> StoryManager could then run.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Tony
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>
>>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to