So I know we're technically able to release with three +1s, but I'm wondering if it might be a good idea to wait 'til a few more people have had a chance to review the RC before we actually push. Thoughts?
A. On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Ignasi Barrera <[email protected]>wrote: > Run the verification script and everything is OK. > > * Project builds and all unit tests pass > * No RAT violations > * Checksums and signatures match > * Releaser signature is in place > * No binaries are present in the distribution > * LICENSE and NOTICE files are OK (with the chef copyright date thing > already spotted by Andrew P.) > * Dependencies were properly downloaded from the staging repository > > Run live tests for the following providers: > > chef-10: Tests run: 50, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 > chef-11: Tests run: 50, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 > enterprise-chef: Tests run: 47, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 > cloudsigma2-lvs (labs): Tests run: 50, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 > > > +1 to release it. > > Good job Andrew! > > > P.S. In the vote for RC1, the tests failures in the cloudsigma2-lvs > provider appeared because the public ip and private vlans of the live > test account had expired. I've purchased a few again and live tests > are passing now (it would be a nice improvement to throw a > SkipException if no networking is available instead of failing the > tests). > > > On 21 December 2013 20:35, Andrew Phillips <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The update is sufficient, I believe. > > > > > > OK, thanks! In that case: > > > > ======================================================================= > > Apache ID: andrewp > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > [X] +1 Release. > > [ ] -1 Don't release (see notes). > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Checklist (all items optional, mark only those personally verified): > > > > [X] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. > > [ ] Expanded source archive matches contents of RC tag. > > [X] Expanded source archive builds and passes tests. > > [X] LICENSE is present and correct. > > [X] NOTICE is present and correct, including copyright date. > > [ ] All files have license headers where appropriate. > > [X] All dependencies have compatible licenses. > > [X] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. > > [X] I follow this project's commits list. > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Notes: > > * Ran 'mvn clean install -Dmaven.javadoc.skip=true', which includes the > > RAT plugin execution. > > * Checked for compiled archives by searching for ".jar", ".bin", > > ".zip" and ".tar.gz" in the expanded source archives > > * Slight discrepancy in the Chef NOTICE file, but I don't think this > > should block the release, since 2013 is included in the copyright date > > in all files > > * Built the blobstore-basics example for jclouds-examples and ran it > > successfully against ninefold-storage > > > > Thanks for pushing out the new RC, abayer! > > > > ap >
